Definition of Treatable Zones
Treatable zones in non-invasive body contouring designate body regions where localized adipose tissue deposits can be effectively treated by non-invasive technologies. Treatable zone characterized by:
presence of localized fat deposit (0.5-3cm depth adipose tissue),
device applicator access (compatible anatomical geometry),
absence of local contraindications (scars, implants, infections),
zone skin coverage with acceptable retraction elasticity. Each zone has specific response profile depending on fat depth, adipocyte density, vascular and lymphatic distribution, local hormonal profile.
Treatable Zones: Anatomical Details, Protocols and Results
| zone | technology_best | depth_adipose_cm | sessions_cryo | sessions_emt | sessions_cavitation | expected_result_cryo | expected_result_emt | expected_result_cavitation | timeline_weeks | special_notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper abdomen (epigastric) | Cryolipolysis, EMT/HIFEM | 1.5-2.5 | 1-2 | 6-8 | 6-8 | 25-35% reduction | 22-28% fat reduction + muscle definition | 18-24% reduction | 8-12 | Optimal zone, excellent vascular access. Cryolipolysis faster. EMT for concomitant abdominal definition. |
| Lower abdomen (sub-umbilical) | Cryolipolysis, EMT/HIFEM | 2.0-3.0 | 2 | 7-8 | 10-12 | 22-30% reduction | 20-28% fat reduction | 12-18% reduction | 10-16 | Greater adipose depth. Cryolipolysis effective but depth slightly limiting. Cavitation less effective at distance. Patience required. |
| Flanks (love handles) | Cryolipolysis, Cavitation | 1.0-2.0 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 6-8 | 27-35% reduction | 20-25% fat reduction | 18-25% reduction | 6-12 | Very good response all technologies. Superficial optimal zone. IceSlim IV 4-applicators treats both flanks simultaneously. |
| Iliac crests | Cryolipolysis, Cavitation | 1.5-2.0 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 7-9 | 26-32% reduction | 15-20% fat reduction (limited lateral muscle) | 20-28% reduction | 6-14 | Excellent cryolipolysis + cavitation response. EMT less optimal (moderate lateral muscle response). Synergistic combination recommended. |
| Anterior thighs | EMT/HIFEM, Cryolipolysis | 2.0-3.0 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 8-12 | 18-24% reduction | 25-32% fat reduction + muscle toning | 15-20% reduction | 8-16 | EMT optimal (quadriceps responsive). Cryolipolysis moderate (depth, large surface). Cavitation less effective at depth. |
| Posterior thighs/cellulite | Cavitation, Bipolar RF | 2.0-3.0 | 2-3 | 7-8 | 8-10 | 14-20% reduction | 18-22% fat reduction (moderate) | 16-24% reduction | 10-18 | Cellulite responds less to contouring. Cavitation targets collagen septae. Cavitation + RF combination optimal for skin texture. |
| Arms (triceps) | Cryolipolysis, EMT/HIFEM | 1.5-2.0 | 1 | 4-6 | 6-8 | 20-28% reduction | 26-32% fat reduction + triceps toning | 16-22% reduction | 6-12 | Very good response. Cryolipolysis rapid 1 session alone. EMT excellent triceps toning. Small zone quick results. |
| Double chin (submental) | Cryolipolysis | 1.0-1.5 | 1 | 4-6 (non-optimal) | 6-8 | 22-30% reduction | 8-12% (limited muscle depth) | 14-20% reduction | 6-12 | Cryolipolysis GOLD STANDARD for double chin (FDA approved). Spectacular profile contour results. EMT not recommended (coil depth limitation). |
| Back (bra straps) | Cryolipolysis, EMT/HIFEM | 1.5-2.0 | 1-2 | 6-8 | 8-10 | 16-24% reduction | 18-24% fat reduction + dorsal muscle | 15-20% reduction | 8-14 | Cosmetically important accessory zone. All technologies effective. Combine with arm/abdomen for global protocol. |
| Knees (lipomas) | Cryolipolysis | 1.0-1.5 | 1 | N/A | 4-6 | 20-28% reduction | N/A (no muscle) | 12-18% reduction | 6-10 | Localized lipomas. Cryolipolysis very effective small zone. EMT inapplicable (no knee muscle). Cavitation viable alternative. |
| Inner thighs | Cryolipolysis, Cavitation | 1.5-2.5 | 1-2 | 6-8 | 7-9 | 22-28% reduction | 22-28% fat reduction (limited adductors toning) | 16-22% reduction | 8-14 | Delicate sensitivity zone. Cryolipolysis good. EMT possible but moderate muscle response (small adductors). Cavitation acceptable. |
Zone-Specific and Technology-Specific Considerations
SCARS: Previous scars in treatment zone → altered heat/cold absorption, unpredictable results. Recommendation: preliminary test patch, consider alternative zone if extensive scar.
IMPLANTS: Metal implants (non-ferrous less concern) in treatment region generally safe. Pacemaker/neurostimulators: absolute EMT contraindications (magnetic field can interfere). Other metal implants moderate caution (orthopedic hip, knee: EMT possible with >10cm distance).
GRAVITATIONAL GEOMETRY: Gravitational zones (lower abdomen, posterior arm, posterior thighs) may have altered thinning reaction (skin ptosis post-fat reduction, requires concomitant RF or EMT muscle compensation). Non-gravitational zones (flanks, iliac crests) better skin reaction.
HETEROGENEOUS FAT DISTRIBUTION: Zones with variable adipose distribution (oblique abdomen, etc.): homogenize applicator treatment covering entire zone uniformly. IceSlim IV 4-applicators: simultaneous asymmetry coverage reduces.
PRE-EXISTING INFLAMMATION: Zones with mild chronic inflammation (dermatitis, mild eczema): treatment possible AFTER inflammation resolution (minimize skin damage). Active infection in zone: absolute contraindication (defer treatment 1-2 weeks post-infection clearance).
Frequently Asked Questions
Abdomen, flanks, thighs, arms, double chin (face) = zones of primary adipose accumulation.
Yes, local treatment achieves targeted zone fat reduction; not systemic reduction.
Abdomen: 1-3 cm average after series; thighs: 1-2 cm; arms: 0.5-1 cm.
Typically 1-2 weeks allows recovery and permits resorption cycle.
Face (thin skin, proximal vital structures), neck (lymphatic structures) require adapted technique.
Yes for destroyed adipocytes; recurrence prevention = diet + regular activity.
Sources scientifiques
- Manstein D, Laubach H, Watanabe K, et al.. Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non-invasive fat removal. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (2008) ;40(9) :595-604 . PMID: 18951424
- Jacob CI et al.. High-intensity focused electromagnetic technology evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging, histological findings, and patient outcomes. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (2018) ;17(6) :658-664 . PMID: 29887260
- Kilmer SL et al.. Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (2016) ;48 :3-13 . PMID: 26607045
- Bani D, et al.. Histological and Ultrastructural Effects of Ultrasound-induced Cavitation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open (2013) ;1(6) . PMID: 25289235
- Hodgson-Garms M et al.. Non-surgical body contouring: mechanisms and efficacy of cavitation and radiofrequency. Dermatologic Surgery (2015) ;41(10) :1138-1149 . PMID: 26313733
Pages connexes
Localized Fat Reduction
Treatable zones for localized fat: abdomen, flanks, hips, thighs, arms, chin. Results by technology (cryo, EMT, cavitati...
Cryolipolysis
Cryolipolysis: physics of cold, lipid crystallization, adipocyte apoptosis, clinical results and treatment protocols...
EMT/HIFEM
EMT/HIFEM: supramaximal contraction technology, muscle hypertrophy, indirect lipolysis, clinical results and protocols...
Ultrasonic Cavitation
40kHz ultrasonic cavitation: ultrasound physics, microbubble formation, adipocyte destruction, protocols, and clinical r...
Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue
Subcutaneous adipose tissue: anatomy, composition, metabolic role, targets for non-invasive body contouring...
Vous souhaitez en savoir plus ?
Contactez nos experts pour une démonstration personnalisée des appareils NeoCure.
Demander une démonstration